PLAYBOOK 06 · MEDICAL ENDOSCOPE COMPONENTS
How to Score and Prioritize Accounts
Why This Matters
Research gives evidence. Scoring turns that evidence into priority. Don't score assumptions — score evidence. A number you cannot explain cannot guide a decision.
What to Enter: The Evidence-Weighted Score
Each dimension is a piece of evidence from Research — with a confidence level, a weight, and a reason for the score.
Weight 25. Core ICP fit — confirmed by the product page, so no points held back.
Weight 20. The architecture suggests a need for rod lenses, but the sourcing model is not confirmed — so 2 points held back.
Weight 15. The team can technically evaluate a Tier 2 rod-lens supplier.
Weight 10. Regulatory evidence of a real medical-device maker, not a generic optics shop.
Weight 20. Hiring is a strong inference of R&D activity; the COMPAMED lead is weaker — 4 points held back until there is a direct contact.
Weight 10. Only a website and a trade-show contact, no direct contact yet — the gap to fix before outreach.
NordScope = 88 / 100 · Tier A. Every point is tied to a piece of evidence from Research — and the reachability gap is the one thing to fix.
Why We Entered It This Way
The score changed after research. Before research it was a hypothesis; after research it became an evidence-backed A tier — and the missing contact was the one thing to fix.
See It in B2B Outbound OS

The score shows why the account is a priority, not just that it is.
Do It Yourself
- Score one verified account
- Give every dimension a reason
- Turn the total into a priority tier